fixed · two weeks

Your AI-assisted work: is it actually right, and can you prove you checked?

Everyone has a policy. Almost nobody has tested whether the outputs are accurate and whether the file shows the check. We sample real work products and test both — then tell you where the failure modes are by task type.

2weeks end to endBy taskfailure modes, not generalitiesWorkedexamples in the report
not a law firm, and we say so
the problem

A hallucinated citation is a training problem. An undocumented check is a supervision problem.

Both end up in front of a regulator. We test accuracy on a sample of your AI-assisted outputs, then read the files to see what the record shows about who verified what — because that is the part that decides how a complaint resolves.

  • Accuracy testing on real work products, with worked examples
  • Review of file notes and supervision trails
  • Task-level failure analysis: summary, research, chronology, drafting
who this is for
Firms already using AI at volume in production work
Firms whose supervision model assumes humans catch everything
Firms preparing training and wanting it aimed at real weaknesses
01

Free 3-file check

Send three live files. We review them the way a reviewer would and send one page of findings in about 48 hours. No charge, no obligation.

02

A fixed number, in writing

If there is something worth fixing you get scope, deliverable, turnaround and fee stated plainly — the same day you ask.

03

Delivery, then evidence

Work runs to the dates in the proposal, and you finish with documents you can file, show a client or hand to an insurer.

questions we get asked

Straight answers, before you spend anything.

QHow do you find AI-assisted work?+
We ask departments for outputs they know were AI-assisted, and we sample matters where the pattern of work suggests it. Where the file is silent, that silence is itself a finding.
QDo you need to see client files?+
We need samples of work products, and ideally the corresponding file notes. Redacted sets are fine; we can also work on synthetic equivalents of the same task types.
QWill you tell us to stop using AI?+
No. We will tell you which tasks are safe with the right checks, which need tighter supervision, and which your firm should not automate — with the evidence for each conclusion.
QHow is this different from an AML review?+
Different object, same discipline. AML reviews test compliance records; this tests work quality and supervision evidence.
MLR 2017 reg 21 · independent audit ISO/IEC 42001 readiness · not certification
// start here

Send three files.
We'll tell you what a reviewer would flag.

  • No charge and no obligation — you keep the findings either way
  • Turned around in ~48 hours, encrypted transfer only
  • Most firms find at least one issue they did not know they had
Book the free 3-file check → Talk to us about cost Or write to — replies usually the same day.